Application Integration 360° Method Feedback and Analytical Hierarchy Process as a Performance Assessment of Employees

(Case Study on Credit Unions "X", Nganjuk)

  • Chumayrotus Syatori'ah
  • Widhy Wahyani
Keywords: Performance appraisals, 360 degree feedback method, analytical hierarchy method (AHP), human resources


Human Resources (HR) in a companies and industry is needed to create high competitiveness based on performance results conducted on the company and the industry. In an effort to improve the quality of human resources, a company needs to conduct performance appraisals. Therefore, the Cooperative "X" necessary to assess employee performance that is objectively by 360 degreemethod feedback and Analythical Hierarchy Method (AHP). From the research results, obtained performance variable priority is adaptability and flexibility are at the sub-variables to adjust to any changes in the work environment. The highest value for employee performance by initials IM (0.64), the worker who has has initialA (0.95), the initial U (0.37) is in the variable adaptation and flexibility. The highest value for employee performance by initial Y (0.40), the initial S (0.35) that the co-operative variables and cooperation. The highest value for employee performance with the initial E (0.61), the initial N (0.60), S (0.57), and D (0.83) is in the variable reliability / accountability. The highest value for employee performance with the initial C (0.06) is in the variable and problem-solving initiatives. The highest value for employee performance H (1.07) is in the variable quality of work. Method 360-degree performance appraisal feedback integration more effectively and objectively describe the performance of employees from several sources assessor and obtain material for evaluation as a reference in the development of quality employees.



AA Anwar King Mangkunegara. 2005. The HR Performance Evaluation.Bandung: Publisher Refika Aditama.

Ali Hasan. 2013. Assessment of Performance with 360-degree method, Available from:

(accessible on the Saturday, June 13th, 2015 at 12:59 pm).

Jhonli Pardosi, et al. 2013. Integrati on Performance Measurement Using a 360 Degree Feedback and AHP in PT.S. Journal of Industrial Engineering: North Sumatra (accessible on the Saturday, December 6th, 2014 at 11:29 pm).

Pandarion. 2011. Analytics Hierarchy Process, Available from: / (accessed on Tuesday, 10 November 2015).

Rahayu, Heroine. 2014. Understanding the characteristics of asean economic society,

Available from:

-karakteristik society-economy-asean.html (accessed on the day of Friday, June 12th,

at 21:46 pm).

Sarwono, Jonathan. 2013. Change Data Ordinal to Interval Data with successive Method

Interval (MSI), Available from: (accessed on Friday, 18September 2015 at 9:03 pm).

Ruth Rohan, et al , 2003. 360-Degree Feedback In The Context Of Leadership Development

In The Ado, Available from: (accessed on Wednesday, February 11, 2015 at 12:15 pm).

Tia Dwi Chasanah, et al. 2014. Assessment of Human Resources Employee Performance Based 360 Degree Competence with Methods (Case Study in KebonAgung Malang). Journal of Agricultural Industrial Technology: Malang (accessed on Saturday, 07 February 2015 at 11:33 pm).

Widyowa ti, Arini. 2011. Application Performance Appraisal System 360 Degree In Business Boost Positive Perceptions towards Performance Assessment Procedural Justice. Journal of the Faculty of Psychology:Yogyakarta (accessed on a Wednesday, April 15th, 2015 at 11: 52 pm).

How to Cite
Syatori’ah, C., & Wahyani, W. (2018). Application Integration 360° Method Feedback and Analytical Hierarchy Process as a Performance Assessment of Employees. Inscientech: Journal of Industrial, Science and Technology, 1(02), 35-41. Retrieved from

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.